Representative Greg Macpherson (D-Lake Oswego) eloquently called upon the state to
adopt marine reserves in today's "Mac Report" to constituents:
"Oregon
leads the nation in protecting its natural resource lands. Our
comprehensive land use planning system prohibits most development
outside urban growth boundaries. But no such protections extend to the
ocean waters along the state's coastline.
The first three
nautical miles from the shore constitute Oregon's "territorial sea".
This public property belongs to all of us. As a state representative,
I'm responsible for looking after it.
The submerged continental
shelf and the waters above it are one of the most productive regions of
the state. In healthy coastal waters, kelp and other sea plants grow
abundantly. Shellfish attach to boulders. Bottom dwelling vertebrate
fish grow to maturity there before moving into the deep ocean.
But
like any natural resource, Oregon's coastal waters can suffer from
human activities. Past over-fishing has depleted stocks we depend on
for a key protein source. Anything that disturbs plants and smaller
fish in these waters weakens the low-end of the food chain. Mistreated
areas can turn into water-filled deserts.
In recent years
countries around the world have adopted a new method for protecting
coastal waters - marine reserves. Activities that remove animals and
plants or alter habitats are prohibited inside the reserves. Examples
of prohibited activities are fishing, aquaculture, dredging, and
mining. Boating, swimming, and scuba diving are usually allowed in
marine reserves.
Restrictions on fishing to allow depleted
stocks to recover are not new. But historically these have been
narrower in scope and apply for only a limited time. By contrast,
marine reserves provide complete and permanent protection.
Scientific
studies show that marine reserves substantially improve the health of
coastal waters they cover. The sheer volume of plants and animals,
known as biomass, increases several-fold. The number of plant and
animal species nearly doubles. The average body size of fish and the
number of species also increases.
The U.S. lags behind several
other countries in establishing marine reserves. Australia, Spain, even
the Philippines have done more. Most U.S. marine reserves are located
in Florida and southern California. Washington State now has several.
Oregon
currently is the only west coast state with no marine reserves. The
legislature has the opportunity to change this when it convenes next
January. Strategic placement of reserves along the Oregon coast would
improve the health of our ocean ecosystem.
Any proposal to
restrict human activity in natural resource areas faces resistance.
Operations that depend on coastal fish stocks fear losing access.
Commercial fishermen must bring in a catch in order to repay loans for
boats and equipment.
Marine reserves should be located and sized
to balance these needs with the restoration they provide. Done right,
they will improve the resources commercial and recreational fishing
depends on. And the reserves will act like a savings account, providing
more resilience to the fragile nearshore ecosystem.
But fishing
isn't the only resource to consider. As we cut our dependence on
imported oil, waves along the coast offer a potential source of
renewable energy. The placement and size of marine reserves must
accommodate this resource too.
Most Oregonians' experience with
coastal waters consists of what they can see in a walk on the beach.
But a healthy ocean also sustains roughly $1 billion in coastal
economies. We all have a stake in how this resource is used. With care
and foresight, Oregon can be a leader in ocean use planning as well as
land use planning."
More about Marine Reserves
Recent Comments