Upcoming Events

Salem Watch

How to Post

  • Anybody who provides their name and email address can comment on a post. Anybody who's interested in becoming a guest author so that they can post their own articles, should email tresa@olcv.org.

Legal Stuff

  • This site is published by the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, but copyright to and responsibility for all posts and comments are owned by their respective authors. Obviously, the posts and comments here are the views of their authors, and not of anyone else. While we're strong believers in free speech, we reserve the right to delete comment spam or other offensive material.

« Fun with Maps -- Marine Reserves | Main | Friends don't let friends cast uninformed votes »

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

How to vote on Oregon's State Ballot Measures

As usual, there are some controversial ballot measures to vote on this November. Many of these measures will derail funding to protect Oregon. I urge NO votes on Measures 59, 61, 62, 63, and 64 and a YES vote on Measure 56.

      

 

Vote NO on Measure 64, Silencing our voice, unclear, unfair and unnecessary

Read more.

 

Vote NO on Measure 63, Unsafe Homes, Overriding Local Environmental Laws

Read more.

Vote NO on 62, Diverting Lottery Funds, Harming Environmental Programs

Read more.

Vote NO on Measure 61, Sentencing Gimmick Would Reduce Environmental Funding

Read more.

Vote NO on Measure 59, Sizemore's Latest Would Gut Natural Resource Funding

Read more.

Vote YES on Measure 56, because every vote should count equally.

Read more.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thanks for the info. I agree on all of them.

One thing that concerns me, and that I haven't seen addressed on this blog or on your main website, is OLCV's endorsement of Ben Westlund. Just 2 years ago OLCV wrote: "Senator Ben Westlund has a lifetime environmental score of 15% - ummmm that's failing."

Sure is. Then why in the heck is OLCV endorsing him? Just because he's changed his spots (and the letter after his name) over the last year? Not that the other two candidates are likely to be pro-environment, but OLCV's endorsement of Westlund is really making me question your organization's integrity. Are you just an extension of the Democratic Party?

Thanks for your post Jack.

You're right. Westlund wasn't always strong on the environment. He scored 42% on OLCV's 2005 Scorecard for the Legisalture (an improvement from 0% in 2003) and was actually named OLCV Consensus Builder of the Year in the 2005 Scorecard for his efforts.

In the 2007 legislative session, he was one of only four Senators to score a 100%.

You can learn more about his environmental record here:http://www.olcv.org/accountability/2007legislativescorecard/2007Senate/benwestlund

and his plans for Oregon's environment if elected Treasurer here:http://www.benwestlund.com/issues_environment.php

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Oregon Environmental News

Friends and Allied Blogs

  • Below, you'll find some blogs of allied organizations whose voices we think might interest you.

BlueOregon

Environmental Health News